Cirugía mayor ambulatoria de la glándula tiroides y paratiroides: resultados tras 6 años de experiencia / Major outpatient surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands: results after 6 years experience

Objetivo: La cirugía mayor ambulatoria (CMA) y con estancia inferior a 24 horas (overnight stay) se ha consolidado en muchas patologías aunque en cirugía tiroidea y paratiroidea resulta controvertido. El objetivo es valorar nuestros resultados en cirugía del tiroides y paratiroides en régimen de CMA durante un periodo de 6 años. Material y Métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo de pacientes con indicación de hemitiroidectomía o paratiroidectomía enfocada en régimen CMA entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2016. Los pacientes cumplían criterios de CMA. En los primeros años se excluyeron los nodulos tiroideos mayores de 3 cm y los pacientes ASA III. Los pacientes ingresaron la mañana de la intervención, tras el acto quirúrgico pasaron a la Unidad de Recuperación Posquirúrgica y posteriormente a sala de hospitalización. Tras 8 h, si cumplían criterios, fueron dados de alta. Resultados: Se intervinieron 270 pacientes, la tasa de aplicabilidad global fue del 59%, la tasa de aceptabilidad global del 83,6% y el índice de sustitución del 49,2%. El índice de ingresos no deseados fue del 10,4% para la paratiroidectomía y del 17,6% en la cirugía del tiroides. Ningún paciente presentó complicaciones mayores en su domicilio. El grado de satisfacción fue alto o muy alto en el 94% de los pacientes. Conclusiones: La paratiroidectomía enfocada y la hemitiroidectomía realizada por cirujanos expertos en pacientes seleccionados, es segura y efectiva en régimen ambulatorio. Es posible mejorar el índice de sustitución ambulatorio aumentando la tasa de aplicabilidad y aceptabilidad.

Objetive: Ambulatory or overnight stay surgery have been consolidated in many different procedures. However, its use in thyroid and parathyroid surgery is still controversial. The aim of this report is to present the results of 6 years of ambulatory patients undergoing surgery of the thyroid or parathyroid glands. Material and Methods: Prospective observational study of patients who underwent hemithyroidectomy or selective parathyroidectomy in the ambulatory program from January 2011 to December 2016. All patients included met the general criteria of ambulatory surgery. During the first years nodules bigger than 3 cm and patients classified as ASA III were excluded. Patients arrive at hospital the morning of surgery. After the operation, patients pass to the post-anesthesia care unit and then to the hospitalization room. 8 hours after surgery patients are discharged home if they meet the criteria. Results: 270 patients were operated, 159 of them met the inclusion criteria. The overall applicability rate was 59%. The acceptance rate was 83.6% and the substitution index was 49.2%. The unwanted hospital admission was 10.4% for the parathyroidectomy and 17.6% for the hemithyroidectomy. Any patient presented major complications at home. The satisfaction rate was high or very high for 94% of the patients. Conclusion: Selective parathyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients can be safely and effectively carried out in ambulatory surgery (outpatient). It would be possible to improve the substitution index by increasing the application and acceptability ratios.

Clinical usefulness of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism

PURPOSE: The availability of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring allows successful focused parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). The objective of this study was to report our initial experience in IOPTH monitoring during parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidsim. METHODS: Between May 2011 and February 2013, 37 patients underwent focused parathyroidectomy due to pHPT. IOPTH monitoring based on Miami criteria was used to confirm complete excision of hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland during surgery. Medical records of patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Preoperative mean maximal calcium level was 11.7 ± 0.9 mg/dL. Preoperative technetium (99mTc) sestamibi scan and ultrasonography identified 32 of 37 (86.5%) and 29 of 37 (78.4%) of abnormal parathyroid glands, retrospectively. Results of the 2 imaging modalities were discordant for 8 cases (21.6%). The mean pre-excision PTH level was 147.2 ± 201.5 pg/mL. At 5- and 10-minute post tumor resection, PTH levels were 65.3 ± 25.4 pg/mL and 47.5 ± 24.3 pg/mL, respectively. In all cases, IOPTH levels fell by at least 50% after removing all suspected abnormal glands. All patients had a successful return to normocalcemia after surgery (mean follow-up period: 60.2 ± 15.4 months). CONCLUSION: Surgeon could confirm complete excision of abnormal hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands by IOPTH monitoring during surgery for pHPT. IOPTH monitoring can maximize performance of successful focused para thyroidectomy for pHPT, especially when preoperative imaging results are discordant.

Minimally Invasive Focused Parathyroidectomy (MIFP)

PURPOSE: The usual surgical treatment for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism is to remove the diseased parathyroid gland. Despite the high success rate of conventional bilateral exploration of both sides of the neck with identification of all parathyroid glands, there has been considerable recent interest in focal exploration for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. The development of preoperative localization methods has been enhancing the effectiveness of various minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. We invented a new surgical method - minimally invasive focused parathyroidectomy (MIFP) and accomplished successful treatment for the patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. METHODS: From Jan. 2002 through Sep. 2003, 25 consecutive cases out of 39 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who were treated by MIFP were enrolled in this study. We analysed retrospectively the success rate, operation time, length of incision, hospital stay, complication rate and influence of preoperative localization methods. RESULTS: There were 21 women and 4 men with a mean age of 54.1 years. All were examined preoperatively with ultrasonography and/or 99mTc-sestamibi scan to localize the diseased parathyroid gland. The mean length of incision was 2.3 cm and mean operation time was 32 min. Twenty-four patients (96.0%) successfully underwent MIFP, with only one case of conversion to conventional approach. CONCLUSION: MIFP is a safe, cost-effective and definite operative method for patients who are appropriately selected by careful preoperative localization studies.